[Pachi] self-play

Vlad Dumitrescu vladdu55 at gmail.com
Sat Aug 6 10:30:00 CEST 2011

Hi Petr,

(Congratulations on the thesis!)

I see. Using pass_all_alive seems to be helping so far.

Thanks for the help!

On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 10:22, Petr Baudis <pasky at ucw.cz> wrote:
>  Hi!
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:59:45PM +0200, Vlad Dumitrescu wrote:
>> > I expect that has something to do
>> > with it (sometimes they seem to be passing before all the territory is
>> > settled).
>> Maybe, but why does the estimate of the score depends on it being done
>> by one or the other of the players? The same program should estimate a
>> board the same regardless of who it plays as, shouldn't it? Even if
>> the situation is unsettled or the evaluation is wrong, the same error
>> should be made every time it sees the same board.
>  Yes, but when dead stones are idenitified, this is based on the
> statistics of prevailing board point owner at the final poistion of the
> simulations. The simnulations are randomized so sometimes disagreements
> may appear.
> --
>                                Petr "Pasky" Baudis
> UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are.

More information about the Pachi mailing list