[Pachi] Regression ?

uurtamo . uurtamo at gmail.com
Mon Apr 4 21:07:49 CEST 2016


Small sample statistics can work here. It's out of fashion these days, but
there was a lot of good work that you can use.

s.
On Apr 4, 2016 11:49 AM, "lemonsqueeze" <lemonsqueeze at free.fr> wrote:

>
>
> On 04/04/2016 08:32 PM, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 07:33:13PM +0200, lemonsqueeze wrote:
>>
>>> Oh wow, looks like 32e02d4 is good, but ac859d8 is bad (!)
>>> Either i missed something or something funny is going on ...
>>>
>>> S GAMES WINRATE S.D.    PAIRING
>>> ? 13        0.615   0.135   19-7.5-1-pachi_org-pachi_32e02d4
>>> / 19        0.211   0.094   19-7.5-1-pachi_org-pachi_ac859d8
>>>
>>
>> Well, these are *really* small sample sizes. :)  But it could be carrying
>> some information.
>>
>> Are you compiling without Cafe in these tests?
>>
>>
> Yes, this is without caffe compiled in (code straight from repo)
> I hope it's just bad luck because code-wise it makes no sense to me =)
>
> The strange thing is that 20% winrate keeps popping up pretty consistently
> (11+15+19=45 games so far). Esp full-strength games, i'd expect less
> variance if there's really a strength difference, but maybe i'm mistaken.
> I'll try to play more games to find out...
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pachi mailing list
> Pachi at v.or.cz
> http://rover.ms.mff.cuni.cz/mailman/listinfo/pachi
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rover.ms.mff.cuni.cz/pipermail/pachi/attachments/20160404/810ca7be/attachment.html>


More information about the Pachi mailing list